BiodivConnect

For reasons of fairness and equity, neither the Call Secretariat nor the Funding Organisation contact points can answer questions related to the research themes of the proposals, i.e., whether these are in adequacy with the call text.

Applicants are strongly advised to take careful note of the aims and scope of the call and to assess the relevance of their proposed research against the thematic priorities as described in the Announcement of Opportunity (Call Document 1).

Applicants are invited to submit proposals addressing one or more of the three main topics outlined in the Announcement of Opportunity, (Call Document 1). This call support knowledge exchange and capacity building across disciplines and societal sectors, and acknowledge, appreciate and integrate multiple forms of knowledge. The points listed under each topic serve to give an idea of knowledges gaps which could be addressed by projects. They should not be understood as an exhaustive list, nor as a list to be fulfilled in with as many points as possible. Applicants are advised to consider that the extent of knowledge gaps they address within their project is realistic for the requested project duration of three years.

We try to go beyond the linear model of research (basic vs. applied research) and there are no formal requirements in this sense. The call aims at funding excellent projects, which include both academic excellence and innovative science on one hand and stakeholder engagement and the demonstration of a clear societal impact, including policy impact on the other hand. Transdisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and cross-sectoral approaches are greatly encouraged. Some funding organisations may have specific rules with respect to TRL. Please consult the national / region funding organisation rules.

Proposals are strongly encouraged to be transdisciplinary and to include non-academic stakeholders working together with researchers to co-produce new knowledge relevant for society. They should do so by considering the potential societal (including policy) impacts of their research (i.e., reflexive and introspective). Where relevant, stakeholders should be involved in different stages of the project, for example in the initial phase when defining research objectives and strategies, in implementing the project through data collection or analysis, to contribute to better dissemination of the knowledge gained, and/or to facilitate a systemic approach to a challenge. However, this involvement must not be an end in itself, but should be designed to add clear value to the project. For guidance, please consult the Biodiversa+ handbooks on Stakeholder engagement and on Citizen science (all Biodiversa+ guiding documents can be found here). If the inclusion of relevant stakeholders within the project management is not feasible or useful, this should be explained including how the proposed work remains valuable in a societal context.

According to the Biodiversa+ evaluation criteria, proposals will be judged on both scientific excellence and their expected impact on society and policy, in addition to project implementation. Proposals should therefore focus on clear research questions with tractable and testable hypotheses and clearly explain expected societal and policy impact as well as their stakeholder engagement approach. In the proposal, applicants should detail how stakeholders will be engaged in the project: who may benefit from or make use of the research, how they might benefit from and/or make use of the research, and methods for engaging with stakeholders and exchanging / disseminating data/knowledge/skills in the most effective and appropriate manners.

A stakeholder is a person or group who is affected by or has an interest or stake in a particular issue. Examples of stakeholders include policy makers, governments, business leaders and industry representatives, representatives from non-profit groups or other citizen organisations, and individuals from loosely defined user groups.

An end-user is defined as a person or group that makes use of the knowledge and/or tools in a position to apply the information or tools being generated by a research project in a way that is of direct consequence to the concerned issue.

End-users can be “proximate’, that is those who directly benefit from the project, or more “ultimate”, i.e., those that may indirectly benefit from the outcomes in a broader geographical scope or longer term.

All end-users could also be considered stakeholders, but not all stakeholders are end-users.

Project proposals, in addition to being academically excellent, are expected to consider innovative ways to have better impact on policy, as the holistic approach of this call includes going beyond traditional biodiversity actions, actors, academic disciplines, and methodologies. Biodiversa+ developed a guide for policy relevance of research projects to help researchers understand what is meant by policy and societal relevance and how this is evaluated in proposals. This guide is available here. We encourage you to use it when designing your project and preparing your proposal, although note that it is currently being updated.

While applicants are seeking to present policy relevant research and engage in science-policy interfacing in their proposals, they should make sure to include the four S.I.E.V. elements, as described in the guide: Statement (on the policy relevance of the proposed research), Identification (of relevant policies and stakeholders), Engagement (activities are planned and presented in the proposal) and Value (added by the transnational dimension of your proposal for policy-making).

Transnational added value is the value resulting from the transnational research project, which is additional to the value that would have resulted from research projects funded at national or regional level.

Evidence of transnational added value can either be found directly among the countries involved in the research, or through indirect value accrued as a result of their joint work. Such value could for example include relevance to international policy and management processes, linking expertise and efforts across international teams, or upscaling of downscaling of efforts, methodology and knowledge across countries and regions.

For this call, the transnational added value should be end-user oriented and benefit environmental and societal actors beyond researchers, generating insights on the way, with emphasis on inclusion, social justice and equity.

Transnational added value will be assessed as part of both the criterion Impact and scientific excellence.

Transdisciplinarity refers to the inclusion of non-academic stakeholders working together with researchers from multiple scientific disciplines at the different stages of the project to co-produce new knowledge relevant for society. Where relevant, stakeholders should be involved in different stages of the project (e.g., initial phase when defining research objectives and strategies, in implementing the project through data collection or analysis, to contribute to better dissemination of the knowledge gained, and/or to facilitate a systemic approach to a challenge. However, this involvement must not be an end in itself, but should be designed to add clear value to the project.

Interdisciplinary science refers to the involvement of multiple academic disciplines. Research teams should therefore span all disciplines of relevance for their project, be it natural, social and technical sciences, humanities, and/or arts. Proposals should demonstrate how they will ensure the equitable and appropriate combination and inclusion of relevant academic disciplines, collaboratively integrating their approaches and skills.

Transdisciplinarity will be evaluated by policy/management experts, part of the assessment criterion “Impact”, while interdisciplinarity will be evaluated by scientific experts, part of the assessment criterion “Excellence”.

At the scale of the call, the research is not geographically limited. The scope or scale of the proposed research should exceed a single country and the transnational (including European) added value should be clearly demonstrated. Funding organisations may define specific rules regarding the geographic location of the research. This should be verified directly with the concerned funding organisations.

The researchers from different countries may work on sites in a given country; but if the results are mostly relevant for one country only and hardly generalisable, the transnational added value might be insufficient.

The Call Secretariat does not comment on the scientific content of individual proposals. This task will be performed by an independent Evaluation Committee at both steps as well as external reviewers (step 2). For the same reason we cannot provide examples of projects to be funded. Nevertheless, the applicants are encouraged to check the projects previously funded by Biodiversa+.

Be aware of all relevant European initiatives and choose wisely the one best suited for your project. For topics with a strong focus on water and health, the Water4All 2025 Joint Transnational Call is recommended. For topics with a strong focus on circular urban economies transition pathways, the DUT 2025 Joint Transnational Call is recommended. For topics with a strong focus on ocean economy and sustainability, the SBEP 2025 Joint Transnational Call is recommended.

The call is open to any eligible research organisations. National / regional eligibility criteria apply to research entities and for private sector organisations (profit and non-profit).

The main applicant (project coordinator) must be employed by an eligible organisation in one of the countries participating in the call. In other words, the project partner coordinator cannot be self-financed.

We draw your attention on the fact that compliance with Funding Organisations’ eligibility criteria and rules (e.g. eligible budget items) is mandatory; applicants are strongly advised to approach their respective Funding Organisation Contact Point to make sure they respect all the eligibility criteria and rules.

Only eligible pre-proposals and eligible full proposals will be evaluated.

All national / regional eligibility and rules and associated information including the Funding Organisation Contact Point are available here.

Instructions regarding general eligibility, submission, evaluation criteria and other relevant information are also published in the Call Documents).

The BiodivConnect joint call is open to Partners from countries / regions with a Funding Organisation financially participating in the call.

To access the most updated list of participating countries, please consult the dedicated webpage.

Nota Bene: if a country is not listed on the Biodiversa+ website following the call launch, it means that it will not participate in the call. If discussions are still ongoing with a country and there is a chance that it will participate, it would be listed with the mention “pending” or “to be confirmed”.

Each Funding Organisation participating in the call will fund its own national / regional research teams. The detailed list of participating funding organisations and their associated reserved budget is available here.

For a proposal to be considered eligible for funding, the research partners involved in the consortium need to comply with a set of general eligibility rules of the call (Call Document 1). In addition, each project partner must be eligible according to the rules and criteria of their Funding Organisation.

IMPORTANT: If one Partner is not eligible, the whole proposal will be considered ineligible and will not be evaluated, unless the eligibility issue(s) can be fixed without changing the substance of the proposal.

Partners from any country can be associated in a project as self-financed Partners if they can bring a secured budget from their own source of funding.

At Step 2, they should upload a signed official letter of commitment from their Head of Department or Financial administrator (as appropriate) on the EPSS (.pdf) when submitting their full proposals. The letter of commitment should be maximum 1 page for each self-financed partner and should be written in English. It is the responsibility of the coordinator to compile the letters of all self-financed partners. The letters of commitment are only requested for self-financed partners. Any other letters of support WILL NOT be considered for the evaluation and WILL NOT be forwarded to the Evaluation Committee.

Alternatively, non-eligible partners may be sub-contracted by eligible partners if their Funding Organisation rules permit it.

Further information is available in the Call Documents.

However, please note that:

• The project partner coordinator (i.e., person in charge of the whole project, also referred to as Partner 1) cannot be self-financed. Indeed, it must be eligible to be funded by one of the countries participating in the call and is eligible and employed by an eligible organisation according to the terms and conditions of the participating Funding Organisation to which they apply for support;
• Partners from countries not participating in the call are not counted in the minimum number of three different countries, including at least two different EU Member States of Associated in countries needed in a project to be eligible.

NOTA BENE: If a Partner is not eligible, the whole proposal will be considered ineligible and will not be evaluated, unless the eligibility issue(s) can be fixed without changing the substance of the proposal. But, no change of project partner coordinator will be allowed, except in case of force majeure. Please refer to the Call Documents for more details.

The European Commission funding is a proportional top-up financing mechanism, which goes through each national / regional funding organisation. In other words, applicants cannot request funding directly to the European Commission. The European commission funding is distributed through the national / regional funding organisations (together with the national / regional funding).

An individual researcher affiliated to several organisations cannot request funding for more than one of its affiliated organisations. The individual researcher must declare which research partner within the consortium they represent. They will not be considered as two different partners within the consortium.

It is not forbidden to have a single researcher acting as the Principal Investigator of several research partners within one consortium, except if otherwise defined by a Funding Organisation’s specific rules.

Yet please note that in this case:

• The concerned research partners cannot request funding from several Funding Organisations. They will thus have to choose one Funding Organisation to which funding is requested from, and
• This Partner will not be counted as two different Partners for the eligibility check of the whole consortium.

One of the main eligibility principles is the eligibility of the applicants to one of the Funding Organisations in the countries participating in the call.

In case of IUCN (and other international organisations) it depends on the eligibility of the institution versus its location and the national funding rules of the corresponding Funding Organisation. If a delegation of IUCN is eligible for funding in their country, then they are eligible in the call. If not, they may join the consortium as a self-financed partner or via subcontracting through an eligible partner.

If it is eligible, it will count as a national partner towards the minimum number of eligible partners. If the institution is participating to the project on their own funds, it will not count in the minimum number of partners required.

The project duration is 3 years. Projects are expected to act as transnational project and not as a mosaic of national projects; to this end, as far as possible Partners should participate in the project for its entire duration. However, as needed, position of some team members can be requested for only part of the project’s duration, as long as at least one member of each Partner remains involved for the whole project duration.

A two-step evaluation process will be organised:

The first step will consist in an eligibility check and an evaluation (peer-review) of pre-proposals by an independent Evaluation Committee (EvC), made up of a scientific and a policy/management panel, against the following criteria: fit to the scope of the call, novelty of the research and impact.

The Call Steering Committee (CSC, i.e. all Funding Organisations) will decide on the number of projects to be invited to step 2, strictly following the evaluation made by the EvC. Only successful pre-proposals will be invited to submit full proposals.

The second step will consist in an eligibility check and an evaluation of full proposals by and independent EvC as well as by external reviewer(s) where deemed necessary by the EvC . Both the scientific and policy-management panels of the EvC will convene to evaluate and make the final ranking of the submitted full proposals according to the following assessment criteria: (scientific) excellence, quality and efficiency of the implementation and impact; and – where relevant – considering the reviews obtained from external reviewers.

The CSC will decide on which projects to recommend for funding, strictly following the order of the ranking list established by the EvC.

For more detailed information about the evaluation criteria, please refer to the Call Documents.

First, applicants have to submit pre-proposals (in English): they have to provide information about the project consortia, a 5-pages description of the project, and the required budget for each partner through the Electronic Proposal Submission System (EPSS) before the 7th of November 2025, 12:00 CET (local time in Brussels).

Submission of pre-proposals is MANDATORY; it is not possible to enter the procedure at a later stage.

Then, applicants invited to Step 2 will have to submit their full proposal (in English) through the EPSS before the 14th of April 2026, 12:00 CEST (local time in Brussels).

Please note that it is an ONLINE SUBMISSION. The Electronic Proposal Submission System (EPSS) will be open to the applicants as early as possible and at least one month before each deadline. The online form is the only format that will be accepted. NO application can be sent by email.

Proposals must be written in English only. Proposal written in any other language won’t be evaluated.

You are free to choose any acronym you wish for your proposal as long as it respects the allowed format, i.e., maximum 20 characters including only letters, numbers and space; no special characters.

However, keep in mind that a good acronym increases the impact of the selected research projects, as a wider audience will be able to find the results and pay attention to the good work that is not always reaching full potential with poorly chosen acronym. This should be useful and efficient with respect to communication purposes if your project is selected.

Therefore, it is important to think about a useful and efficient name that is:

• Easy to remember
• Easy to search for and find on internet (unique)
• Providing some ideas regarding the topic of the project

Note that the project title and acronym indicated in your pre-proposals should be considered as definitive.

Pre-proposals and full proposals have to be submitted via the “Electronic Proposal Submission System” (EPSS).

You can download a PDF file of the pre-proposal and full proposal application forms on the call webpage, for information purposes only. Please note that the format of these forms might be slightly modified to fit the EPSS, and that only proposals submitted through the EPSS will be considered for evaluation.

In the EPSS: for both pre-proposals and full proposals, please note that only one PDF file can be uploaded. If you upload more than one file, the first file uploaded will be erased and will not be evaluated. Other file’s types than PDF are not accepted.

A pre-proposal or a full proposal can be declared as ineligible if formatting conditions are not respected.

Letters of support are not requested and won’t be considered for the evaluation, except at Step 2 for self-financed partner who have to provide evidence that their organisations will support their activities at the full proposal step (see question “My country is not participating in the Call. Can I apply?”).

A PIC (Participation identification code) is a 9-digit number serving as a unique identifier for organisations (legal entities) participating in EU funding programmes / procurements. A search tool for organisations and their PICs is available here.

The NACE code is a Statistical Classification of Economic Activities of the organisation. You can find further information about NACE at Eurostat website and the classification can be downloaded here.

If the deadline for submission has not been reached yet, you can write your pre-proposal / full proposal gradually by saving your progress each time. Do not forget to save your progress. Once you are done with writing your pre-proposal / full proposal, do not forget to click on the ‘Submit’ button.

Please note that:

• The online platform will stay open 5 minutes after the official deadline. Any proposals that will not be correctly submitted at this moment will be declared ineligible and will therefore not be evaluated nor considered for funding.
• All completed proposals will be submitted automatically when the platform closes to avoid a situation where an applicant does not have time to click on the submit button. In this situation, the proposal will be evaluated as it stands.

No, whether you declare a self-financed partner depends on the visibility you would like to give them in the project consortia. If the tasks and roles they execute are crucial to the objectives of the research proposal, it is highly recommended to add these partners on the EPSS as to have the proposal evaluated to its full extent.

No, whether you declare a subcontractor depends on the visibility you would like to give them in the project consortia and if you have already the administrative information. Subcontractors are subject to the terms and conditions of each Funding Organisation providing the subcontracting costs and need to comply with their rules. Generally speaking, subcontracting is understood as the externalization of the execution of a (minor) project task that research Partner(s) cannot execute.

Research projects proposed under this call are carried out by research consortia composed of research Partners.

Depending of the Funding Organisation, a “Partner” may be a researcher, an institution, a department of an institution, a laboratory, or a public or private, for- or non-profit organisation contributing to the implementation of the research partner.

The project partner coordinator is the partner that coordinates a given research consortium.

A self-financed partner is a partner who brings their own secured budget in the call and fully cover their costs.

Subcontractors are subcontracted by eligible partners that have to comply with their respective funding organisation rules.

Stakeholders can be involved in a project as research partners requesting funding from a funding organisation as long as its eligibility is in line with the rules of the concerned funding organisation. Alternatively, if they are ineligible for funding but engaged nonetheless as research partners, stakeholder may be self-financed partners.

The engagement of stakeholders can however take many forms and it is not mandatory to have them involved as research partners. Please refer to the question “What is meant by Stakeholder engagement?”

Not necessarily. Self-financed partners can be any individual or organisation that takes part in the research project as a research partner but who brings their own secured budget in the call and fully cover their costs. Self-financed partners can be academic researchers or stakeholders, from countries participating or not in the call.

The information given in the pre-proposals regarding the research questions and objectives of a proposed project is binding. No change regarding the scientific content will be allowed by the Call Steering Committee (CSC) between the pre-proposals and full proposals. However, it is still possible to make minor changes to improve your proposal if the objectives remain unchanged (you will have to declare these changes in your full proposal). Regarding the administrative details, a limited number of changes may be allowed by the Funding Organisation Contact Point (FCP) and/or CSC, provided they are in line with the general rules of the call and the rules of the Funding Organisations:

• Change of budget can be allowed by the relevant Funding Organisation. The FCP can decide according to its own rules whether it needs a justification for it. There is no need to inform the Call Secretariat.
• Changes in the consortium composition:
  • No change of project partner coordinator (person in charge) will be allowed, except in case of force majeure. A request of change of project partner coordinator must be submitted to the Call Secretariat, at least one week before the deadline for submitting full proposals and it will be discussed on a case-by-case basis by the CSC.
  • Changes in the consortium composition are allowed (maximum three changes of Partners), provided approval by the concerned Funding Organisations. Please note that the following actions are considered as changes: addition or removal of a Partner (incl. self-financed partners). Please note that the maximum number of changes applies to “Partner”; it does not apply to “team member” or “subcontractors”.
    • In case of a removal of a Partner, consortia have to make sure that their consortium still includes the minimum number of requested Partners (excluding self-financed partners). If this is not the case, the project will be declared ineligible and won’t be evaluated.
    • All new Partners have to comply with their respective Funding Organisation’s rules. If a new Partner is declared ineligible at Step 2, the whole consortium will be declared ineligible and won’t be evaluated.

In terms of procedure: The eligibility of new research Partners should be confirmed by the concerned Funding Orgnisation(s) at least one week before the full proposal submission deadline. Applicants are strongly advised to seek confirmation of the changes and the eligibility of new Partners from the FCP, who needs to check the national / regional eligibility of the new Partner and agree with the change, before it is implemented on the EPSS. The changes must be declared on the EPSS in the “disclosure of changes” box.

Please note that the following cases are not considered as one of the maximum three changes but the procedure mentioned above remains the same:

• If the change is explicitly requested by a Funding Organisation after the eligibility decision at Step 1
• If a researcher in charge (person) remains the same but changes the institutions (within the same country), provided the institution fulfils eligibility criteria of the same funding organisation. This does not apply to the Project Partner Coordinator.
• Similarly, if the institution remains the same but the researcher in charge (person) changes, provided the researcher in charge fulfils eligibility criteria of the same funding organisation. This does not apply to the Project Partner Coordinator.

The change(s) should not modify the substance of the proposal. Applicants will have to indicate in their full proposal the changes made as compared to the pre-proposals (for information for the EvC and the Call Secretariat).

Please indicate the acronym of your project when you contact the Call Secretariat and/or your Funding Organisation.

Compliance with Funding Organisation eligibility criteria and rules (e.g. eligible budget items) is mandatory; it is thus strongly recommended that applicants approach their respective Funding Organisation Contact Point to make sure they respect all the all the eligibility criteria and rules.

If one Partner is not eligible, the whole proposal will be considered ineligible and will not be evaluated, unless the eligibility issue(s) can be fixed without changing the substance of the proposal.

The widening option is a measure to encourage participation and success of countries / regions with small research communities and/or where research applications have been less successful at Step 1 (pre-proposals). On a voluntary basis, consortia invited to submit a full proposal in Step 2 will have the possibility to include one or several new research Partner(s) from undersubscribed funding organisations between Step 1 and 2.

Change of budget can be allowed by the relevant Funding Organisation. The FCP can decide according to its own rules whether it needs a justification for it. There is no need to inform the Call Secretariat.

Apart from the position of coordinator, there are no rules at the level of the Call regarding the number of proposals in which a partner can be included:

• The project coordinator (person in charge) can only participate as coordinator in one proposal of this call.
• Other research partners can participate in several proposals as long as this is in line with their Funding Orgnisation’s eligibility rules.

Regarding the last point, we insist on the fact that some Funding Organisations have specific rules for this aspect. Please make sure that each national / regional team follows its relevant Funding Organisation rules. Specific questions should be addressed to the Funding Organisation Contact Points. All information regarding national / regional rules and focal points can be found here.

Parallel submissions refer to multiple submission of a similar proposal (as a whole or in parts) to other funding opportunities / initiatives with overlapping evaluation process timewise or to the same programme. Applicants must provide details of any parallel submissions on the EPSS at both the pre-proposal and full proposal stage.

Duplication of funding is not allowed for the same (whole or part) research project.

Please note that some Funding Organisations have specific rules on the possibility to apply as applicant in different proposals. Make sure you comply with your Funding Organisations’ rules.

In addition, we draw your attention on the fact that other relevant calls for research proposals are being launch in 2025 by European initiatives, which you may find under the “Are there any other related European funding opportunities in 2025 and how to choose which one is the most relevant for my research project?” of the FAQ.

As duplication of funding for the same proposal is not allowed, make sure to carefully choose the best fit for your proposals based on the scope of each call and their respective research priorities.

According to the Biodiversa+ 2025-2026 common rules, no Consortium Agreement must be submitted with the full proposal form. However, please note that after the evaluation process and project selection, some national Funding Organisations require the project partners selected for funding to establish a project consortium agreement.

Biodiversa+ has developed a Partner Search Tool (PST) that allows you to look for a Partner for a Project you would like to submit; or look for a Project to join. You simply have to fill in a Partner / Project Search form on the EPSS.

Your form will then be visible on the platform, and you may be contacted. You have the possibility to search for partners or projects to join on the platform according to different criteria: country, discipline, keywords.

Concerning the widening option:

• Applicants from undersubscribed funding organisations can declare their interest to join a consortium invited to Step 2. To facilitate contact with the coordinator of the full proposal, applicants are invited to include the acronym of the proposal they want to join when declaring their interest in the PST. They are also encouraged to check the PST for new offers of interest by successful consortia.
• The successful consortia may use the PST to look for new Partners from undersubscribed funding organisations, in case they would like to add expertise to their consortium. They will have the opportunity to post a detailed offer on the Biodiversa+ PST.

The project must be a transnational project involving eligible research Partners from minimum three different countries financially participating in the call and requesting support from at least three different Funding Organisations; including eligible research Partners from at least two different EU Member States Horizon Europe Associated Countries participating in the call.

No, only research partners based in countries with national / regional funding organisation(s) that have confirmed their financial participation and reserved a budget for this call are eligible for funding. The list of eligible countries / regions and associated participating funding organisations is available here.

According to the call’s common rules, there are no rule regarding the duration of contract for each project team members. However, make sure your project stay in line with the specific rules defined by national / regional Funding Organisations. National / regional restrictions about work contract / position may exist.

The call on a general level does not specify any restriction regarding the coordinator’s experience or profile. There are two formal requirements for a coordinator: they need to be employed by an eligible institution and cannot change between Step 1 and 2. The rest is in the domain of the Funding Organisations and their eligibility rules. Nevertheless, this is a highly competitive call and the competence and expertise of the consortium, including the leadership skills, will be assessed by the independent panel of experts.

No, the project partner coordinator cannot be self-financed. It must be eligible to be funded by one of the countries participating in the call and is eligible and employed by an eligible organisation according to the terms and conditions of the participating Funding Organisation.

The Project Partner Coordinator can only participate as Project Partner Coordinator in one proposal of this call. Otherwise, applicants can participate in several proposals (as long as this is in line with their Funding Organisation’s eligibility rules).

Apart from the obligation to form consortia of teams from a sufficient number of countries participating in the call, there is no pre-requisite regarding the size of the projects.

However, keep in mind that a transnational programme such as Biodiversa+ aims at supporting medium size research projects (average for Biodiversa+ funded projects: 5-7 partners per project from different countries) though this remains flexible.

There are no rules regarding a minimum or maximum budget per project at the level of the Call. Projects will be evaluated on their general coherence, and on the adequacy of the funding requested compared to the scientific objectives and activities planned. However, funding requirements for a given project should be reasonable as compared to total amount of funding planned for a given Funding Organisation. The aim of the call is to fund medium size projects (with a total budget of typically 1.0-1.3M€ on average; but note that this constitutes an indication rather than a formal limit). The requested funding should be justified and relevant with regards to the work planned within the project.

However, please note that some Funding Organisations have defined minimum and/or maximum amount of funding per partners or per project in their Funding Organisations’ rules. Please make sure to follow these rules. Specific questions should be addressed to the Funding Organisation Contact Points.

In case of a too high financial pressure on a participating country due to the high number of teams from this country in the submitted applications, the applicants may be asked to proceed budget cuts.

Yes, a subcontractor can be subcontracted by more than one research partner, as long as this is in line with the funding organisation rules of the subcontracting partners. Applicants should therefore make sure to verify their funding organisation rules and the eligibility of the costs to be requested.

Applicants are required to produce and implement an open access data management plan to enable the sharing of research data. Data management plans are part of the full proposals and are included in the evaluation as part of the criterion “quality and efficiency of the implementation”. A data management workshop will be organised shortly after the start of the funded projects. Biodiversa+ has developed a guide on data management, open data and the production of data management plan available here.

First and foremost, please read entirely all the information including the Call Documents. Please also consult your Funding Organisations’ rules and, if needed, contact your Funding Organisation Contact Points (FCPs).

• For specific questions related to the budget, criteria and rules of your Funding Organisation, please consult your FCPs.
• For general information on the call, please contact the Call Secretariat: biodiversa.cs@agencerecherche.fr
• For technical questions regarding the EPSS, please contact the EPSS technical helpdesk: Taavi Tiirik at epss.biodiversa@g.etag.ee